Williams v. District of Columbia

806 F. Supp. 2d 44 (2011)

From our private database of 46,100+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Williams v. District of Columbia

United States District Court for the District of Columbia
806 F. Supp. 2d 44 (2011)

SR
Play video

Facts

Christina Conyers Williams (plaintiff) sued the District of Columbia (District) (defendant) on grounds that the District violated the District of Columbia Whistleblower Protection Act. Around June 2, 2008, during the discovery phase of the litigation, the District produced documents to Williams. The response included a “recommendation to terminate packet” that consisted in part of an email to which the then-Deputy General Counsel for the District’s Department of Health was a party. The email discussed Williams’ proposed termination. The District later realized it had inadvertently produced the email and, on November 22, 2008, wrote to Williams demanding the immediate return of the email and forbidding its use or disclosure. Williams never responded to the demand and the District did not follow up in the next two years and eight months of litigation. In July 2011, Williams listed the email on her exhibit list. On July 20, 2011, the District moved to exclude the email.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Kollar-Kotelly, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 745,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 745,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,100 briefs, keyed to 987 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 745,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,100 briefs - keyed to 987 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership