Quimbee logo
DMCA.com Protection Status

Williams v. Florida

399 U.S. 78 (1970)

Case BriefRelatedOptions
From our private database of 34,000+ case briefs...

Williams v. Florida

United States Supreme Court

399 U.S. 78 (1970)

Play video

Facts

The Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure required a criminal defendant to give pretrial notice to the prosecution if he planned on raising an alibi defense at trial, including information about the place the defendant claimed to have been and the names and addresses of any alibi witnesses the defendant intended to call at trial. In advance of his robbery trial, Williams (defendant) moved for a protective order to be excused from the rule's requirements, arguing that the rule violated his Fifth and Fourteenth Amendment rights by compelling him to be a witness against himself. However, Williams ultimately complied with the rule after his motion was denied. Williams also filed a pretrial motion for a 12-person jury instead of the six-person jury provided by Florida law in noncapital cases; this motion was denied. Williams identified Mary Scotty as his alibi witness. Prosecutors called Scotty for a pretrial deposition. Scotty then testified at trial that Williams was at her apartment during the time of the robbery. The prosecution impeached Scotty twice during cross-examination with her deposition testimony. The state also presented the rebuttal testimony of an officer who said that Scotty had asked him for directions during the time in which she claimed to be in her apartment with Williams. The jury ultimately convicted WIlliams, and he was sentenced to life in prison. The appellate court affirmed the conviction. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (White, J.)

Concurrence (Burger, C.J.)

Concurrence/Dissent (Marshall, J.)

Concurrence/Dissent (Black, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 607,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 607,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 34,000 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 607,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 34,000 briefs - keyed to 984 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership