Williams v. Florida
United States Supreme Court
399 U.S. 78 (1970)
Florida law requires that a defendant give pre-trial notice to the prosecution if he plans on calling an alibi witness at trial. Williams (defendant) complied with this rule after his motion for a protective order was denied. Mary Scotty, Williams’ alibi witness, was then called in by the prosecution for a deposition prior to trial. During her trial testimony, the prosecution was able to impeach Mary Scotty on two occasions with her deposition testimony. The state also presented the rebuttal testimony of an officer who said that Mary Scotty had asked him for directions during the time in which she claimed to be in her apartment with Williams.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (White, J.)
Concurrence/Dissent (Black, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 168,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 13,800 briefs, keyed to 187 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.