Williams v. Jones
United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
571 F.3d 1086 (2009)
- Written by Shelby Crawford, JD
Facts
Williams (plaintiff) was charged with first-degree murder. Williams wanted to accept an offer made during plea bargaining. Williams’ attorney advised him that he would commit perjury if he pled guilty and told Williams he would not represent him if he pled guilty. Williams declined the plea offer. He was found guilty and sentenced to life in prison without the possibility of parole. On appeal, the state court sent the case back to the trial court for a hearing to determine whether Williams was given ineffective assistance of counsel during plea bargaining. The trial court held that Williams had received ineffective assistance but that he had not been prejudiced by it. On appeal, the state appellate court upheld the trial court’s finding of ineffective assistance of counsel and held that Williams was prejudiced by it because he lost the opportunity to accept the plea offer due to his attorney’s advice. The court reduced his sentence to life in prison with the possibility of parole. Williams argued that this remedy was insufficient and petitioned for a writ of habeas corpus in federal district court. The court denied his petition, and Williams appealed to the federal court of appeals.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Per Curiam)
Dissent (Gorsuch, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.