Williams v. National Gallery of Art
United States District Court for the Southern District of New York
2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 154445 (2017)
- Written by Robert Cane, JD
Facts
Oskar Moll, Greta Moll’s husband, commissioned Henri Matisse to paint a portrait of Greta (the painting). In 1947, Greta gave the painting to Oskar’s former student, Gertrude Djamarani, to take to Switzerland for deposit with an art dealer for safekeeping. Djamarani sold the painting without Greta’s authorization or knowledge and kept the proceeds. Ultimately, the National Gallery of Art (the gallery) (defendant) in London acquired the painting in 1979. The gallery was a public instrumentality of Great Britain. In 2015, Greta’s heirs, Oliver Williams, Iris Filmer, and Margarete Green (plaintiffs) demanded that the gallery give them the painting, but the gallery refused. In 2016, Greta’s heirs brought an action against the gallery; the United States-based nonprofit organization, American Friends of the National Gallery, London Inc.; and Great Britain (defendants) to recover the painting. The gallery and friends moved to dismiss the action based on immunity under the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act (the act).
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Caproni, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.