Williams v. National Gallery of Art

2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 154445 (2017)

From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Williams v. National Gallery of Art

United States District Court for the Southern District of New York
2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 154445 (2017)

  • Written by Robert Cane, JD

Facts

Oskar Moll, Greta Moll’s husband, commissioned Henri Matisse to paint a portrait of Greta (the painting). In 1947, Greta gave the painting to Oskar’s former student, Gertrude Djamarani, to take to Switzerland for deposit with an art dealer for safekeeping. Djamarani sold the painting without Greta’s authorization or knowledge and kept the proceeds. Ultimately, the National Gallery of Art (the gallery) (defendant) in London acquired the painting in 1979. The gallery was a public instrumentality of Great Britain. In 2015, Greta’s heirs, Oliver Williams, Iris Filmer, and Margarete Green (plaintiffs) demanded that the gallery give them the painting, but the gallery refused. In 2016, Greta’s heirs brought an action against the gallery; the United States-based nonprofit organization, American Friends of the National Gallery, London Inc.; and Great Britain (defendants) to recover the painting. The gallery and friends moved to dismiss the action based on immunity under the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act (the act).

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Caproni, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,400 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership