United States Supreme Court
136 S. Ct. 1899 (2016)
Terrance Williams was charged with first-degree murder. District Attorney (DA) Ronald Castille approved the case for the death penalty. The jury convicted Williams and sentenced him to death. Williams appealed and the conviction was affirmed. Williams filed a petition for habeas corpus in state court. The state court granted Williams’s habeas corpus petition and stayed his execution. The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania appealed to the Pennsylvania Supreme Court. The Chief Justice of the state supreme court at the time was former DA Castille. Williams filed a motion to recuse Castille from hearing his case. Castille denied the motion and heard the case. The state supreme court reinstated the death penalty on the ground that Williams’s habeas petition was untimely. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Kennedy, J.)
Dissent (Thomas, J.)
Dissent (Roberts, C.J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 222,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.