Study Aids
Case Briefs Overview
Casebooks
Case Briefs
W

Williams v. Polgar

214 N.W.2d 149 (1974)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Williams v. Polgar

Michigan Supreme Court
214 N.W.2d 149 (1974)

Facts

Walter and Violet Williams (plaintiffs) purchased property from Julia Polgar (defendant), at which time Polgar furnished an abstract of title. The abstract incorrectly omitted a deed from the chain of title. As a result of the error, the Williamses were obligated to remove a building from the property. The Williamses brought suit against Polgar and American Title Insurance Company (American) (defendant), the successor in interest to the original abstractor. The trial court found that the statute of limitations began running as of the execution of the land contract and granted judgment to Polgar and American. The Williamses appealed. The appellate court reversed and remanded. American requested leave to appeal to the Michigan Supreme Court, which was granted.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Williams, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership

Casebooks

Torts

Key Terms