United States Supreme Court
529 U.S. 362 (2000)
Terry Williams (defendant) was convicted and sentenced to death. The Virginia Supreme Court affirmed. Williams petitioned the Danville Circuit Court for relief for ineffective assistance of counsel. The judge found Williams’ attorneys did not offer mitigating evidence at sentencing or give “reasonable, professional competent assistance of counsel” required by Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984), but the Virginia Supreme Court denied rehearing. Williams requested federal habeas relief under the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 (AEDPA), 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The court found the death sentence invalid, but the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reversed, holding § 2254(d)(1) forbids relief unless the state court construed or applied the law in a way that is unreasonable to all reasonable jurists. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Stevens, J.)
Concurrence (O’Connor, J.)
Concurrence (Stevens, J. (Part II))
Concurrence/Dissent (Rehnquist, C.J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 201,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.