From our private database of 35,400+ case briefs...
Williams v. Weisser
California Court of Appeals
273 Cal. App. 2d 726 (1969)
B. J. Williams (plaintiff) was a university anthropology professor. In 1965, J. Edwin Weisser (defendant) paid a student of Williams to take notes on Williams’s lectures. Weisser, in turn, printed the notes, placed a copyright notice on them bearing Williams’s name, and offered them for sale. Williams filed suit, alleging that Weisser had infringed his common-law copyright and invaded his privacy by using Williams’s name without his consent. The lower court agreed with Williams and granted a temporary injunction to enjoin Weisser from producing or selling the notes. Weisser appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Kaus, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 617,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 617,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 35,400 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.