Williamson Oil Co. v. Philip Morris USA

346 F.3d 1287 (2003)

Study Aids
Case Briefs Overview
Casebooks
Case Briefs
W
From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Williamson Oil Co. v. Philip Morris USA

United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
346 F.3d 1287 (2003)

Facts

In 1993, Philip Morris, Inc. (PM) (defendant), made the decision to drastically lower the price of its best-selling cigarettes. At the time, the cigarette-manufacturing industry was oligopolistic, with five firms controlling 97 percent of the market. After PM lowered its prices, other cigarette manufacturers followed suit. As a result of the price competition, the profits for cigarette manufacturers decreased considerably. Eventually, PM began to increase the price of its cigarettes, and the other manufacturers again followed suit. The prices of cigarettes were raised several times between 1993 and 2000, and the manufacturers settled on roughly the same price increase each time. Williamson Oil Company, Inc., and other cigarette wholesalers (the wholesalers) (plaintiffs) brought a complaint against PM and several other manufacturers (defendants), alleging that the parallel price increases amounted to a price-fixing conspiracy. The district court granted the manufacturers’ motion for summary judgment, and the wholesalers appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Marcus, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 803,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 803,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 803,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership

Casebooks

Antitrust

Key Terms

Related Videos