Willie S. Griggs v. Duke Power Company
United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
420 F.2d 1225 (1970)

- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
The Civil Rights Act of 1964 (the Civil Rights Act) prohibited racial discrimination in hiring and promoting. Legislative history around an amendment to the Civil Rights Act indicated that senators did not intend a blanket prohibition on employers administering general-intelligence tests if the employer fairly administered such tests. However, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) ruled that testing requirements for employment must be job related to satisfy the Civil Rights Act. Prior to the enactment of the Civil Rights Act, Duke Power Co. (Duke) (defendant) categorically excluded Black employees from all but one of Duke’s departments: the labor department, in which the highest-paid employee earned less than the lowest-paid employee in any other department. In 1955, Duke began requiring a high-school degree for placement in any department other than labor and for transfer to any of the more desirable departments. Beginning in 1965, the date on which the Civil Rights Act went into effect, Duke added an additional path to promotion out of the labor department: passage of one of two high-school equivalency tests. The tests purportedly measured general intelligence but had no relation to job-performance ability. A number of Black employees (plaintiffs) challenged Duke’s diploma and testing policies under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act. Six of those employees were hired prior to 1955; four of those employees were hired after 1955. The district court held that Duke’s policies reflected no discriminatory purpose and had been applied equally to Black and White employees.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Boreman, J.)
Concurrence/Dissent (Sobeloff, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.