Logourl black
From our private database of 14,100+ case briefs...

Willing v. Mazzocone

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
393 A.2d 1155 (1978)


Facts

Helen Willing (defendant) was represented by the law firm of Mazzocone and Quinn (the firm) (plaintiff) in a workers’ compensation case. Willing was indigent and believed that the firm stole $25 of the settlement that was obtained in the case. Because of this, Willing demonstrated in a heavily trafficked area near City Hall, wearing a sign that accused the firm of stealing money from her and selling her out to the insurance company. While demonstrating, Willing pushed a shopping cart with an American flag, rang a cow bell, and blew on a whistle. Willing refused a request from the firm to stop demonstrating, and the firm sued her in equity, seeking an injunction against further demonstrations. The trial court found that the firm clearly did not steal from Willing and that Willing refused to believe convincing proof of this fact. The trial court entered an injunction against further unlawful demonstration containing defamatory and libelous statements against the firm. Willing appealed to the Superior Court of Pennsylvania, which only slightly modified the injunction. Willing appealed to the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Manderino, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Concurrence (Roberts, J.)

The concurrence section is for members only and includes a summary of the concurring judge or justice’s opinion.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Dissent (Eagen, C.J.)

The dissent section is for members only and includes a summary of the dissenting judge or justice’s opinion.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 222,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.