Wills v. Walt Disney Pictures and Television
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
183 F.3d 862 (1998)
- Written by Kyli Cotten, JD
Facts
Michael Wills (plaintiff) and Robert Thurlwell (plaintiff) were craft service workers at Walt Disney Pictures and Television, Inc. (Disney) (defendant), as well as senior members of the International Alliance of Theatrical Stage and Motion Picture Machine Operators (the union) (defendant). Disney hired craft service workers less senior than Wills and Thurlwell for its production of In the Army Now. Wills and Thurlwell submitted grievances to the union. The union ultimately chose not to pursue the grievances because both Wills and Thurlwell were unavailable for work at the time the positions were filled. After production of In the Army Now was underway, another less-senior craft service member was hired for a position in the production when Wills and Thurlwell were available. As a result, the union pursued renewed grievances against Disney and secured a settlement of $400 each. In addition, Thurlwell secured an authorized leave of absence from Disney to go work on a Fox Television program. Despite the authorization, Thurlwell received a letter from Disney discharging him from his job and thereby severing his seniority. The union declined to pursue a grievance for this issue. Wills and Thurlwell brought suit against the union, alleging that it breached its duty of fair representation by declining to pursue certain grievances and negotiating a low settlement amount. The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of the union on all claims. Wills and Thurlwell appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Bright, Reinhardt, Rymer, J.J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 814,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.