Wilson v. Arkansas
United States Supreme Court
514 U.S. 927 (1995)
- Written by DeAnna Swearingen, LLM
Facts
Sharlene Wilson (defendant) sold drugs to an informant for the Arkansas State Police in November and December of 1992. Wilson later threatened the informant with a gun. Police secured a warrant to search the home Wilson shared with Bryson Jacobs (defendant), who had convictions for arson and firebombing. Police announced themselves as they entered the unlocked screen door and passed through the open main door to the home. Wilson was in the bathroom flushing drugs down the toilet. Police found drugs, drug paraphernalia, and a gun. Wilson and Jacobs were arrested on various drug charges. Wilson filed a pretrial motion to suppress the evidence found during the search claiming, among other things, that the search violated the Fourth Amendment since police did not “knock and announce” before entering the property. The trial court denied the motion, and Wilson was convicted by a jury and sentenced to 32 years imprisonment. The Arkansas Supreme Court affirmed. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari to determine whether the knock and announce rule is part of the reasonableness test required by the Fourth Amendment.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Thomas, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 806,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
