Wilson v. Knowles
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
638 F.3d 1213 (2011)
- Written by Arlyn Katen, JD
Facts
In 1993, Rick Wilson (defendant) pleaded no contest in California state court to (1) gross vehicular manslaughter while driving under the influence of alcohol (DUI) under the California Penal Code and (2) proximately causing bodily injury while DUI under the California Vehicle Code. Both convictions resulted from the same accident; Wilson was drunkenly speeding and lost control of his girlfriend’s car, injuring his girlfriend and killing another passenger. Wilson had a preliminary hearing but no trial, and Wilson was incarcerated for a year at an addiction-treatment residence. In 2000, a jury convicted Wilson of DUI with a prior felony conviction. The trial court counted the 1993 convictions as Wilson’s first and second strikes, based in part on the prosecution’s evidence about the alleged facts of the 1993 case. Although the court found that in the 1993 accident, Wilson had personally inflicted great bodily injury on a victim who was not an accomplice, those findings were not elements required to support Wilson’s conviction for the 1993 California Vehicle Code offense. Concluding that the 2000 offense was a third-strike offense, the court sentenced Wilson to 25 years to life in prison. Wilson exhausted his state court appeals, then filed a habeas corpus petition in federal district court, contesting his third-strike sentence. The district court denied Wilson’s petition. Wilson appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Noonan, J.)
Dissent (Kozinski, C.J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.