Wilson v. Lane

614 S.E.2d 88 (2005)

From our private database of 46,100+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Wilson v. Lane

Supreme Court of Georgia
614 S.E.2d 88 (2005)

Play video

Facts

Katherine Lane (propounder), as executrix of Jewel Jones Greer’s will, offered her will for probate. The will distributed the estate in equal shares to 16 blood relatives and Lane, Greer’s caregiver before her death. Floyd Wilson (caveator) filed a caveat claiming that Greer lacked testamentary capacity. At a trial in Jasper County Superior Court, the evidence included testimony that Greer was eccentric and feeble, but still of sound mind at the time of executing her will. The evidence also showed, however, that Greer may have been suffering from Alzheimer’s or senile dementia and that a petition for guardianship of Greer was filed by Lane a few months after the will was executed. The petition claimed that Greer was no longer capable of managing her own affairs and her incapacity was caused by Alzheimer’s-related dementia. An expert, whose report indicated that Greer may have early to mid-stage dementia related to Alzheimer’s disease, admitted that he had only reviewed her medical records and had not actually examined her. Testimony also indicated that the petition was filed by Lane in response to concerns raised by the Department of Family and Children’s Services, to enable Greer to continue living in her own home. The jury found that Greer lacked testamentary capacity, but the trial court reversed the jury’s verdict and granted Lane’s motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Fletcher, C.J.)

Dissent (Carley, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 745,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 745,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,100 briefs, keyed to 987 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 745,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,100 briefs - keyed to 987 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership