Wilson v. Williams
United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
182 F.3d 562 (1999)
Jackie Wilson (plaintiff) was accused and subsequently convicted as an accomplice to the murder of two police officers. While Wilson was awaiting trial, prison guard James Williams (defendant) allegedly attacked Wilson without provocation. Wilson sued Williams for the serious injuries Wilson sustained in the alleged attack. Wilson filed a pretrial motion in limine, which would have prevented Williams from telling the jury about Wilson's involvement in the police murders. The trial judge denied Wilson's motion. In his opening statement to the jury, Wilson's lawyer acknowledged Wilson had been convicted as an accomplice in the police murders, and argued the nature of Wilson's crime explained Williams's otherwise unprovoked attack. Throughout the trial, Williams's lawyer used inflammatory language to emphasize Wilson's involvement in the crime, and repeatedly referred to Wilson as a "cop killer." Wilson's lawyer did not object to this language. The jury found for Williams, and Wilson appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Easterbrook, J.)
Dissent (Wood, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 174,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.