Logourl black
From our private database of 14,100+ case briefs...

Wilson v. Wilson

Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia
706 S.E.2d 354 (W. Va. 2010)


Facts

Mr. Wilson (husband) (defendant) and Ms. Wilson (wife) (plaintiff) were married. The couple formed Hunter Company of West Virginia (Hunter), a real estate development business. The husband and the wife each owned half of Hunter’s stock. Hunter was hired by National Land Partners (NLP) as an independent contractor to manage real estate development projects. NLP paid Hunter in the form of manager fees. Hunter oversaw a variety of individuals to carry out this task. However, Hunter could not hire these individuals without the approval of NLP. Also, Hunter did not pay any of these individuals directly. In fact, the only individual that Hunter paid directly was the husband. Hunter’s agreement with NLP contained a payment provision in the event the husband died. The provision provided that NLP would pay Hunter based on the progress of its work at the time of the husband’s death. Hunter was a very successful business due to the husband’s work. The wife filed a petition for divorce. The wife sought distribution of the NLP manager fees on projects in which Hunter was engaged at the time of divorce. The family court found that Hunter had enterprise goodwill. Accordingly, the family court held that the manger fees were marital property subject to distribution. The Circuit Court of Berkeley County reversed, finding that Hunter had only personal goodwill associated with the husband as an individual. The wife appealed.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Workman, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 222,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.