Windham v. State
Mississippi Supreme Court
602 So.2d 798 (1992)

- Written by Carolyn Strutton, JD
Facts
Otis Lee Windham (defendant) and Albert Calvert got into an argument about a debt Windham owed to Calvert outside Calvert’s grocery store. Windham was 21 years old, and Calvert was 79 years old and had only one arm. When Calvert’s 78-year-old wife, Betty, came upon the argument, Windham was gripping Calvert’s arm. Betty struck Windham in the face when Windham refused to let go of Calvert’s arm. Windham then reached into his car, grabbed a hammer, and hit Betty on the head with it, knocking her unconscious. When Betty regained consciousness, she saw her husband slump to the ground in front of her. Calvert died soon after from severe head injuries that an autopsy found were consistent with a blow from a blunt object. Windham was charged with murder but claimed at trial that he had only thrown Calvert to the ground, not hit him with the hammer. Windham was found guilty and appealed. The Mississippi Supreme Court reversed the conviction and remanded the case for a new trial. At the second trial, Windham was again charged with murder. The judge gave instructions to the jury on various theories of culpability, including simple murder, depraved-heart murder, inexcusable manslaughter, and excusable manslaughter. Windham was convicted of murder and sentenced to life imprisonment. Windham appealed and alleged among other claims that the judge should not have given the depraved-heart murder instruction to the jury because doing so substantially diminished the jury’s consideration of the manslaughter option.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Prather, J.)
Concurrence (Robertson, J.)
Concurrence (Hawkins, J.)
Dissent (Banks, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.