Winegeart v. Winegeart
South Dakota Supreme Court
910 N.W.2d 906 (2018)
- Written by Liz Nakamura, JD
Facts
Eryn Marie Winegeart (plaintiff) and Weston Lee Winegeart (defendant) jointly owned a marital home. Weston filed for divorce in 2016, and both parties vacated the home. The parties attended one mediation session in March 2017 pursuant to a court order and signed a confidentiality agreement for the session. After the mediation, Weston signed an agreement with a real estate broker to list the marital home for sale, which included a commission for the realtor. When a buyer was found, Eryn refused to sign the purchase agreement, stating that Weston had orally agreed in mediation to sell the home privately without paying a realtor. Weston moved the circuit court to have Eryn sign the purchase agreement. At a hearing, Eryn introduced testimony from the mediator that the parties had orally agreed to a private sale with no realtor commissions. The circuit court found the oral agreement unenforceable and ordered Eryn to sign the purchase agreement. On April 15, the parties signed a property-settlement agreement, which stated that it was a complete agreement and that the parties disagreed about the payment of realtor fees. The circuit court granted the divorce on April 18, incorporating the property-settlement agreement. Eryn appealed, arguing the circuit court erred by not enforcing the parties’ oral agreement. Weston countered, arguing that mediation communications are confidential, that Eryn signed a confidentiality agreement, that the circuit court’s ruling cannot be reversed because it was not clearly erroneous, and that any oral agreement was superseded by the subsequent property-settlement agreement.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Gilbertson, C.J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 806,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.