Winegeart v. Winegeart

910 N.W.2d 906 (2018)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Winegeart v. Winegeart

South Dakota Supreme Court
910 N.W.2d 906 (2018)

  • Written by Liz Nakamura, JD

Facts

Eryn Marie Winegeart (plaintiff) and Weston Lee Winegeart (defendant) jointly owned a marital home. Weston filed for divorce in 2016, and both parties vacated the home. The parties attended one mediation session in March 2017 pursuant to a court order and signed a confidentiality agreement for the session. After the mediation, Weston signed an agreement with a real estate broker to list the marital home for sale, which included a commission for the realtor. When a buyer was found, Eryn refused to sign the purchase agreement, stating that Weston had orally agreed in mediation to sell the home privately without paying a realtor. Weston moved the circuit court to have Eryn sign the purchase agreement. At a hearing, Eryn introduced testimony from the mediator that the parties had orally agreed to a private sale with no realtor commissions. The circuit court found the oral agreement unenforceable and ordered Eryn to sign the purchase agreement. On April 15, the parties signed a property-settlement agreement, which stated that it was a complete agreement and that the parties disagreed about the payment of realtor fees. The circuit court granted the divorce on April 18, incorporating the property-settlement agreement. Eryn appealed, arguing the circuit court erred by not enforcing the parties’ oral agreement. Weston countered, arguing that mediation communications are confidential, that Eryn signed a confidentiality agreement, that the circuit court’s ruling cannot be reversed because it was not clearly erroneous, and that any oral agreement was superseded by the subsequent property-settlement agreement.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Gilbertson, C.J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 806,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 806,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 806,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership