Winegeart v. Winegeart
South Dakota Supreme Court
910 N.W.2d 906 (2018)
- Written by Liz Nakamura, JD
Facts
Eryn Marie Winegeart (plaintiff) and Weston Lee Winegeart (defendant) jointly owned a marital home. Weston filed for divorce in 2016, and both parties vacated the home. The parties attended one mediation session in March 2017 pursuant to a court order and signed a confidentiality agreement for the session. After the mediation, Weston signed an agreement with a real estate broker to list the marital home for sale, which included a commission for the realtor. When a buyer was found, Eryn refused to sign the purchase agreement, stating that Weston had orally agreed in mediation to sell the home privately without paying a realtor. Weston moved the circuit court to have Eryn sign the purchase agreement. At a hearing, Eryn introduced testimony from the mediator that the parties had orally agreed to a private sale with no realtor commissions. The circuit court found the oral agreement unenforceable and ordered Eryn to sign the purchase agreement. On April 15, the parties signed a property-settlement agreement, which stated that it was a complete agreement and that the parties disagreed about the payment of realtor fees. The circuit court granted the divorce on April 18, incorporating the property-settlement agreement. Eryn appealed, arguing the circuit court erred by not enforcing the parties’ oral agreement. Weston countered, arguing that mediation communications are confidential, that Eryn signed a confidentiality agreement, that the circuit court’s ruling cannot be reversed because it was not clearly erroneous, and that any oral agreement was superseded by the subsequent property-settlement agreement.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Gilbertson, C.J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 964,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,500 briefs, keyed to 1,006 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
- AI-generated podcast version of every brief — listen on the go, between classes, or whenever reading isn’t an option. New
Understand your casebook readings in seconds
Use our case briefs to comprehend your casebook readings faster, supplement your notes and outlines, and outshine your peers in class.
Get instant access to over 47,500+ expert-written case briefs in a searchable database keyed to 1,006 law school casebooks.

