Logourl black
From our private database of 14,000+ case briefs...

Winston Research Corp. v. 3M Corp.

United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
350 F.2d 134 (9th Cir. 1965)


Facts

Mincom (plaintiff) created a new and improved “servo” system, which helped the functionality of tape players and recorders. Before the machine went to market, Johnson, who was in charge of Mincom’s research and development program, left the company and started his own company called Winston Research Corp. (Winston) (defendant). Winston hired former Mincom technicians and in just over a year created a machine with the same functionality as Mincom’s machine. Mincom brought suit for misappropriation of trade secrets. The district court found that Winston had misappropriated Mincom’s trade secrets. The district court granted Mincom a two year injunction, enjoining Winston from selling its newly created machine. The district court chose two years in length because since Mincom was about to start selling the machine, the trade secret would soon be public, and two years was about as long as it would take a third party competitor to develop a similar machine based on the soon-to-be-public information. Mincom appealed, seeking a permanent injunction and money damages. Winston appealed, seeking to have the injunction vacated.  

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Browning, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 200,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.