Wisconsin Auto Title Loans, Inc. v. Jones
Wisconsin Supreme Court
714 N.W.2d 155 (2006)
- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
Wisconsin Auto Title Loans, Inc. (plaintiff) provided an $800 loan to Jones (defendant), with Jones using his car title as collateral. Wisconsin Auto had significant experience in granting loans with car titles used as collateral. Jones was indigent and needed money quickly. Wisconsin Auto did not provide any options to Jones with respect to the loan agreement; it was a take-it-or-leave-it, standardized form contract. The agreement provided for an annual percentage rate (APR) of 300 percent. The agreement contained an arbitration provision that required the parties to submit any dispute regarding the agreement to binding arbitration. However, the provision permitted Wisconsin Auto to bring a claim in circuit court to repossess the car or obtain payments from Jones. Further, the agreement required that Jones pay the first $125 of any arbitration filing fee. Jones defaulted on the loan. Wisconsin Auto filed suit in circuit court to recover Jones’s car. The circuit court held that the arbitration provision was unconscionable. The court of appeals affirmed. The Wisconsin Supreme Court granted review.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Abrahamson, C.J.)
Concurrence (Butler, J.)
Dissent (Roggensack, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 790,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.