From our private database of 33,600+ case briefs...
Withrow v. Williams
United States Supreme Court
507 U.S. 680 (1993)
Police officers took Robert Allen Williams, Jr. (defendant) from his home to the police station for questioning about a murder. Forty minutes into the questioning, after Williams had already implicated himself in the crime, officers advised Williams of his Miranda rights. Williams waived his rights and made further inculpatory statements. The State of Michigan (plaintiff) charged Williams with murder. Williams moved to suppress his statements to the officers, but the trial court denied the motion, finding that the officers’ Miranda warnings were timely. Williams was convicted, and his conviction was affirmed on appeal. Williams subsequently filed a federal habeas corpus petition alleging the violation of his Miranda rights. The district court granted a writ of habeas corpus, and the appellate court affirmed. The state petitioned the United States Supreme Court for certiorari, arguing that federal habeas review was not available for Williams’s claim that his conviction was based on statements obtained in violation of Miranda. The state’s argument was based on Stone v. Powell, 428 U.S. 465 (1976), in which the Supreme Court had held that if a prisoner had a full and fair opportunity to litigate a Fourth Amendment claim in state court, federal habeas review was unavailable for the prisoner’s claim that his conviction was based on evidence obtained in an unconstitutional search or seizure. The Supreme Court granted certiorari to determine if Stone’s holding extended to the Miranda context.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Souter, J.)
Concurrence/Dissent (O’Connor, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 603,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 603,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 33,600 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.