Witter v. Taggart
New York Court of Appeals
577 N.E.2d 338 (1991)
- Written by Rocco Sainato, JD
Facts
Lawrance owned a tract of land on Long Island, through which a canal flowed. In 1951, Lawrance partitioned the land, and sold the portion of the land north of the canal. In the deed to the grantee, Lawrance included a covenant stating that anyone holding the land in question was not permitted to build a dock on the canal or otherwise interfere with the view of the canal. This land eventually was sold to Witter (plaintiff). The southern portion, held by Lawrance, remained in his possession until his death. This plot was eventually purchased by Taggart (defendant). Neither Taggart’s deed, nor any other deed in the chain of title between him and Lawrance contained a provision regarding the same restrictive covenant on Witter’s land. When Taggart attempted to construct a dock on the canal, Witter brought this action to enjoin him from doing so. The trial court ruled in favor of Taggart, stating that his land was not subject to any covenant. Witter then petitioned for certiorari to the Court of Appeals of New York.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Bellacosa, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 815,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.