WJLA-TV v. Levin

564 S.E.2d 383 (2002)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

WJLA-TV v. Levin

Virginia Supreme Court
564 S.E.2d 383 (2002)

Facts

Following complaints from multiple female patients, the Virginia Board of Medicine (the board) held a hearing regarding orthopedist Dr. Stephen Levin (plaintiff) and his use of an intravaginal method to treat piriformis syndrome. The board dismissed the complaints, and a patient who reported Levin went to WJLA-TV (WJLA) (defendant). WJLA broadcast promotional segments and a report on Levin’s treatment method. The promotions suggested Levin’s method was sexual assault and labeled him “Dirty Doc” and “the X rated doctor.” The broadcast, which identified Levin by name and included his photo, discussed the allegations that he subjected female patients to inappropriate pelvic exams. The broadcast included statements from piriformis syndrome expert Dr. Loren Fishman and other knowledgeable physicians who said they were unaware of any intravaginal methods to treat the condition. Fishman called the intravaginal method improper but later retracted that characterization. The broadcast did not acknowledge Fishman’s retraction. Levin sued WJLA for defamation and damages in Virginia state court, seeking $30 million in compensatory damages and $350,000 in punitive damages. Levin introduced evidence of over $900,000 in actual damages. WJLA argued against that amount but did not offer any evidence to rebut it. The jury found that WJLA acted with actual malice in broadcasting the report and awarded a total of $2 million to Levin. WJLA appealed, arguing the damage award was excessive and should not have been affirmed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Koontz, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership