Wolf v. Cohen

379 F.2d 477 (1967)

From our private database of 46,000+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Wolf v. Cohen

United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
379 F.2d 477 (1967)

SC

Facts

On August 31, 1962, Parkwood, Inc. (defendant) sold property to Butler for $1,000,000. Subsequently, Parkwood conveyed the property to the Cohens (defendants), subject to Butler’s interest. Meanwhile, Butler assigned his interest to Wolf (plaintiff). On December 4, 1962, the closing date, Parkwood and the Cohens defaulted. The district court awarded specific performance in favor of Wolf. The property was not conveyed to Wolf until February 5, 1965, over two years after the original closing date. On this date, the market value of the property was $1,445,000. Wolf contended that he had contracted to sell the property for $1,800,000 to a third party, but that the buyer had withdrawn due to the delay in the conveyance of the property to Wolf caused by the defendants’ breach. As a result, Wolf sought $355,000 in damages, the difference between the $1,800,000 lost sale and the $1,445,000 value of the property at the time of conveyance. The district court ruled that Wolf was not entitled to damages. Wolf appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Bastian, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 744,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 744,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,000 briefs, keyed to 987 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 744,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,000 briefs - keyed to 987 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership