Wolf v. Toyota Motor Corporation

2013 WL 6596833 (2013)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Wolf v. Toyota Motor Corporation

Delaware Superior Court
2013 WL 6596833 (2013)

Facts

Three members of the Ward family—John, his wife, Joy, and their daughter, Sarah—were killed when the Toyota Camry they were driving was involved in a head-on collision with a Mercedes-Benz owned by John F. Warfield and driven by Darien Custis. Hailey Ward, who was also riding in the Camry, survived the crash. Custis was distracted while reaching for a bottle of iced tea on the floor of the car. Custis later pled guilty to vehicular homicide. Natalie Wolf (plaintiff), as the administratrix of the Wards’ estates and the guardian and next friend of Hailey, brought a crashworthiness products-liability claim against Toyota Motor Corporation (defendant), claiming that defects in the Camry enhanced the Wards’ injuries. Wolf did not name Custis or Warfield as defendants in the action, but Toyota filed a motion requesting leave to join them as third-party defendants, which the trial court denied. The court was asked to consider whether, in a crashworthiness claim, it must allow the action against the manufacturer only for the individual defect and for the injury allegedly caused by the defect, or whether it should allow the jury to hear all the evidence as to how the accident occurred in the first place.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Cooch, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership