Wolofsky v. Behrman
Court of Appeals of Florida
454 So. 2d 614 (1984)
- Written by Rebecca Green, JD
Facts
Peter Wolofsky (plaintiff), a developer, sold a condominium to Harold and Elaine Behrman (defendants). The Behrmans planned to move into the condominium when they sold their family home. When the Behrmans were unable to sell their family home, they decided to sell the condominium instead. Wolofsky repurchased the condominium from the Behrmans, and the parties signed a sale contract. A few weeks before the parties were to close on the sale, one of the Behrmans visited the apartment and found that someone else had been staying there. Wolofsky had already found a new purchaser for the condominium, and Wolofsky had been allowing the new purchaser to stay there prior to the closing. The Behrmans notified Wolofsky that they would not close on the sale and returned Wolofsky’s deposit. Wolofsky sued the Behrmans for damages. The Behrmans admitted to breach of contract, but argued that Wolofsky was not entitled to damages because the Behrmans had not acted in bad faith. The trial court found for the Behrmans. Wolofsky appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Downey, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 810,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.