Wolofsky v. Behrman

454 So. 2d 614 (1984)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Wolofsky v. Behrman

Court of Appeals of Florida
454 So. 2d 614 (1984)

Facts

Peter Wolofsky (plaintiff), a developer, sold a condominium to Harold and Elaine Behrman (defendants). The Behrmans planned to move into the condominium when they sold their family home. When the Behrmans were unable to sell their family home, they decided to sell the condominium instead. Wolofsky repurchased the condominium from the Behrmans, and the parties signed a sale contract. A few weeks before the parties were to close on the sale, one of the Behrmans visited the apartment and found that someone else had been staying there. Wolofsky had already found a new purchaser for the condominium, and Wolofsky had been allowing the new purchaser to stay there prior to the closing. The Behrmans notified Wolofsky that they would not close on the sale and returned Wolofsky’s deposit. Wolofsky sued the Behrmans for damages. The Behrmans admitted to breach of contract, but argued that Wolofsky was not entitled to damages because the Behrmans had not acted in bad faith. The trial court found for the Behrmans. Wolofsky appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Downey, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 810,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 810,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 810,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership