Womack v. Commissioner

510 F.3d 1295 (2007)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Womack v. Commissioner

United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
510 F.3d 1295 (2007)

Play video

Facts

Roland Womack (plaintiff) won the Florida State Lottery. Womack’s lottery winnings were payable in 20 annual installments of $150,000. For three years, Womack received the annual installments, reporting the income as ordinary income on his federal income tax returns. Womack then sold his right to receive the remaining payments to Singer Asset Finance Company (Singer) in exchange for an immediate lump-sum payment of $1,328,000. On his tax return, Womack reported the lump-sum payment as a capital gain from the sale of a long-term asset. Capital gains were taxed at a more favorable rate than ordinary income. Maria Spiridakos (plaintiff) also won the Florida State Lottery. Like Womack, she received annual installments for a few years, then sold the right to the remaining installments to Singer in exchange for a lump-sum payment. She, too, reported the lump-sum payment as a capital gain on her tax return. The commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service (commissioner) (defendant) issued deficiency notices to Womack and Spiridakos, arguing that each party’s lump-sum payment was ordinary income taxable at the higher rate. Womack and Spiridakos separately petitioned the United States Tax Court for redeterminations. The tax court consolidated the petitions and entered judgment in the commissioner’s favor, holding that the lump-sum payments were taxable as ordinary income. Womack and Spiridakos appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Martin, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 811,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership