Appeals Court of Massachusetts
436 N.E.2d 990 (1982)
Wong (plaintiff) agreed to prepare mechanical drawings for Paisner (defendant) for a lump sum of $1,000. Wong claimed that the agreement was later modified to substitute an hourly rate for the work. Paisner paid Wong a lump sum of $500. Wong then sent a bill to Paisner for $5,400, which represented 235 hours of work at $25 per hour, less the $500 that had been paid. Paisner sent Wong a check for $1,000 with a letter that stated that the $1,000 represented payment in full and that the $500 that had previously been paid was an attempt to appease Wong in light of their misunderstanding over the terms of the contract. Wong deleted the phrase “payment in full” from the check and deposited it. Wong sued Paisner for the remainder owed. The trial court refused Paisner’s request to instruct the jury on accord and satisfaction. The jury returned a verdict in favor of Wong for $4,400. Paisner appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 221,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.