Wood v. Boynton
Wisconsin Supreme Court
64 Wis. 265, 25 N.W. 42 (1885)
- Written by Sarah Larkin, JD
Facts
Wood (plaintiff) visited Boynton (defendant), a jeweler, to have jewelry repaired. While there, Wood inquired whether Boynton knew anything about a stone that she had. Wood told Boynton that she had been told it was topaz and Boynton replied that it probably was. Boynton asked Wood if she would sell the stone and offered to give her a dollar for it. Wood at first refused, but later decided to sell the stone. Later, Wood learned that the stone was an uncut diamond worth about $700.00. Wood tendered the dollar plus interest to Boynton and demanded the return of the stone. Boynton refused. At the time of the sale, Boynton was not an expert in uncut diamonds, had never seen one before, and it did not occur to him at the time of the sale that the stone might be a diamond. Wood brought suit. The case was tried by a jury. After hearing all the evidence, the trial judge directed the jury to find in favor of Boynton. Wood moved for a new trial, but the motion was denied. Wood appealed to the Supreme Court of Wisconsin.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Taylor, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 788,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
