Wood v. Coastal States Gas Corporation
Delaware Supreme Court
401 A.2d 932 (1979)
- Written by Eric Miller, JD
Facts
Lo-Vaca Gathering Co. (Lo-Vaca) (defendant) was a subsidiary of Coastal States Gas Producing Co. (Producing) (defendant), which was in turn a subsidiary of Coastal States Gas Corporation (Coastal) (defendant). Lo-Vaca obtained permission to increase its rates to ensure its ability to deliver gas to its customers. The customers brought suit for breach of contract, the rate increase was rescinded, and the customers became eligible for refunds. A complex tangle of litigation resulted in a settlement agreement. The settlement agreement provided for Producing to be renamed Valery Energy Corporation (Valery) and spun off from Coastal, 13.4 percent of Valery common stock to be placed in a trust for the Lo-Vaca customers and the remaining 86.8 percent of the Valery common stock to be distributed as a special dividend to holders of Coastal common stock. Holders of Coastal convertible preferred shares (the preferred stockholders) (plaintiffs) were contractually entitled to share in a distribution resulting from a recapitalization—including a merger or consolidation—but they received no Valery common stock. More specifically, Coastal’s certificate of incorporation stated that the preferred stockholders were entitled to receive, in lieu of common stock receivable in a recapitalization, the same kind and amount of securities distributable upon recapitalization with respect to the common stock. The certificate also provided that no conversion-ratio adjustment would be made for a dividend to the common stockholders payable in property other than Coastal common stock. The preferred stockholders brought suit in Delaware Chancery Court to enjoin a final vote on the settlement agreement. The court held that the distribution of Valery common stock to the Coastal common stockholders was not a recapitalization and was therefore permissible without the preferred stockholders’ participation. The preferred stockholders appealed. The Delaware Superior Court granted certiorari.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Duffy, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 802,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.