Wood v. DeHahn
Wisconsin Court of Appeals
571 N.W.2d 186 (1997)
DeHahn (plaintiff) and Wood (defendant) were the divorced parents of two children. Upon divorce, DeHahn was awarded sole legal custody of the two children. DeHahn was a practicing Mormon, and Wood was a practicing Catholic. As the legal guardian, DeHahn was entitled to choose the children’s religion, and Wood was required to act in a manner consistent with that choice. Wood took the children to Catholic services on Christmas, Easter, and Mother’s Day. DeHahn filed a motion to restrict Wood from taking their children to those three Catholic services each year. The trial court found that Wood was not acting in a manner inconsistent with DeHahn’s choice of religion for the children and denied the motion. DeHahn appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Phillip, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 177,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.