Wood v. Leadbitter
Exchequer Division (U.K.)
153 Eng. Rep. 351 (1845)
Wood (plaintiff) purchased a ticket to attend horse races that were held on property owned by Lord Eglintoun (Eglintoun). The ticket entitled Wood to enter Eglintoun’s property and remain there during the races. For unknown reasons, Eglintoun chose to remove Wood from the property during one of the races. Leadbitter (defendant), Eglintoun’s servant, forcibly removed Wood from the property. Wood sued Leadbitter for assault and false imprisonment. The trial court directed the jury that Eglintoun had the right to remove Wood from the property for any reason and had no obligation to return the money that Wood had paid for his ticket. Wood claimed that his ticket gave him an irrevocable license to remain on Eglintoun’s property during the races. The jury found in favor of Leadbitter.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Alderson, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 174,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.