In Woodby, the Supreme Court consolidated two cases: Sherman and Woodby. In both of these cases, the plaintiffs were aliens who were ordered deported. The issue was what burden of proof the government needed to sustain in a deportation proceeding. In Sherman, the Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit had originally determined that the government has the burden of proving the facts supporting deportability beyond a reasonable doubt. The court then reversed itself in a rehearing en banc, holding that the government need only prove its case with “reasonable, substantial, and probative evidence.” In Woodby, the Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit did not explicitly state what the government’s burden of proof should be, but found that the Board’s evidence was supported by “reasonable, substantial, and probative evidence.” The Supreme Court granted certiorari to resolve the issue of burden of proof.