Woods Investment Co. v. Commissioner

85 T.C. 274 (1985)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Woods Investment Co. v. Commissioner

United States Tax Court
85 T.C. 274 (1985)

KL

Facts

Woods Investment Co. (Woods) (plaintiff) sold all of its stock in four wholly owned subsidiaries, reporting a capital gain. Woods filed consolidated returns in the years leading up to the stock sale in which the subsidiaries depreciated their business property in accordance with accelerated methods allowed by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) during those years. After the stock sale, the commissioner of the IRS (commissioner) (defendant) found that Woods’s tax returns were deficient because Woods’s basis in the subsidiaries’ stock was less than Woods claimed. Woods claimed that its deductions were correct under both I.R.C. § 312(k), which permitted the method of depreciation analysis Woods conducted in its return, and another regulation promulgated by the commissioner. The commissioner argued that applying both § 312(k) and the regulation allowed Woods to recognize a double deduction, which should not be permitted. Woods sought review of the commissioner’s decision by the United States Tax Court.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Fay, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership