Woods v. Bourne Co.

60 F.3d 978 (1995)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Woods v. Bourne Co.

United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
60 F.3d 978 (1995)

  • Written by Jack Newell, JD

Facts

Harry Woods composed the song “When the Red, Red, Robin Comes Bob, Bob, Bobbin Along” (the song). He licensed it to Bourne Company (Bourne) (defendant). Bourne subsequently licensed the song to ASCAP to show programs on television that incorporated the song in exchange for royalties. After Harry Woods died, his heirs working under the name Callicoon Music (Callicoon) (plaintiff) exercised their statutory right to reclaim the license that had been issued to Bourne. Callicoon claimed that all royalties collected after its reclamation of the license belonged to Callicoon. Bourne contended that it retained rights in the derivative works licensed to ASCAP. Callicoon sued in federal district court. The district court ruled in favor of Callicoon, finding that whether the works created during the license period were derivative was dispositive. Bourne appealed to the Second Circuit.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Feinberg, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 811,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership