Woods v. Lecureux

110 F.3d 1215 (1997)

From our private database of 45,900+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Woods v. Lecureux

United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
110 F.3d 1215 (1997)

Facts

Margaret Woods (plaintiff) sued several prison officials in connection with the death of her son, Larry Billups, while he was in prison. Woods dismissed most of the officials over time, but not Art Tessmer and John Jabe (the prison officials) (defendants). Woods alleged that the prison officials should be liable for Billups’s death because they were deliberately indifferent to the risks her son faced in prison. To prove her case, Woods proffered the expert testimony of Dr. Mintzes. The court did not allow Dr. Mintzes to use the term deliberately indifferent during his testimony. During his testimony, Dr. Mintzes stated that he was using deliberately indifferent as a legal term, and he began to define it before the judge interrupted his testimony. Following the court’s order granting judgment as a matter of law in favor of the prison officials, Woods appealed, arguing among other things that the trial court erred in refusing to allow Dr. Mintzes to use the term deliberately indifferent.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Moore, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 741,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 741,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 45,900 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 741,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 45,900 briefs - keyed to 984 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership