Logourl black
From our private database of 14,000+ case briefs...

Woodsam Associates, Inc. v. Commissioner

United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
198 F.2d 357 (2d Cir. 1952)


Facts

In 1922, Mrs. Wood acquired commercial property for $296,400. Mrs. Wood financed part of the purchase price with a mortgage for which she was personally liable. Mrs. Wood took out additional recourse mortgages secured by the property during the subsequent years. In 1931, Mrs. Wood refinanced these various mortgages into a new $400,000 nonrecourse mortgage. Refinancing to a nonrecourse mortgage resulted in (1) a cash payment to Mrs. Wood and (2) the extinguishment of her personal liability for the mortgage. In 1934, Mrs. Wood and her husband formed Woodsam Associates, Inc. (Woodsam) (plaintiff) as a holding company for their real-estate assets. Mrs. Wood transferred the property to Woodsam, along with other properties that she owned. In 1943, the mortgage lender on the property foreclosed to satisfy an outstanding loan balance of $381,000. The mortgage lender acquired the property at the foreclosure sale. Woodsam filed an amended tax return for the year of 1943, seeking a tax refund on the premise that Woodsam’s taxable basis in the property should be computed based on the amount of the nonrecourse mortgage. The tax commissioner (defendant) denied Woodsam’s tax-refund claim. Woodsam petitioned the United States Tax Court for a redetermination. The tax court held in favor of the commissioner, and Woodsam appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Chase, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 177,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.