Logourl black
From our private database of 14,100+ case briefs...

Woolley v. Hoffmann-La Roche, Inc.

Supreme Court of New Jersey
491 A.2d 1257 (N.J. 1985)


Beginning in 1969, Richard Woolley (plaintiff) was employed as an engineering-section head for Hoffmann-La Roche, Inc. (Hoffmann) (defendant). Woolley did not have an employment contract with Hoffmann. In December 1969, Woolley received Hoffmann’s Personnel Policy Manual (manual). The manual included a termination clause, providing that employees would only be fired for cause, and setting forth a specific procedure to attempt to rehabilitate employees before resorting to termination. Hoffmann distributed the manual to all of its employees. In 1978, Hoffmann lost confidence in Woolley after discovering piping problems. Hoffmann terminated Woolley’s employment without following the procedures outlined in the manual. Woolley sued Hoffmann for breach of contract, alleging that the termination clause in the manual constituted a binding provision that prevented Hoffmann from terminating Woolley’s employment without cause. Hoffmann argued that the termination provision was not contractually binding and that Woolley could be fired without cause because he was an at-will employee. The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of Hoffmann. The appellate division affirmed. Woolley appealed.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.


The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Wilentz, C.J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 221,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.