Woolsey v. Nationwide Insurance Co.
United States District Court for the Western District of Arkansas
697 F. Supp. 1053 (1988)

- Written by Josh Lee, JD
Facts
Nationwide Insurance Company (defendant) issued a life-insurance policy for William King. After William’s death, Nationwide paid the benefits, totaling approximately $15,000, to William’s parents, Billy and Anna King (defendants). However, under the policy and Arkansas law, the benefits should have been paid to William’s estate. The estate’s personal representative (plaintiff) sued Nationwide, seeking the proceeds of the life-insurance policy. Nationwide then filed a claim against Billy and Anna, seeking restitution if it was required to pay out the benefits a second time. Billy and Anna presented evidence that they paid for expenses related to William’s death, including his funeral and medical bills, that they would not have paid without the life-insurance proceeds. Billy and Anna never received notice of the opening of the estate, so they never had the opportunity to seek reimbursement of those expenses from the estate.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Arnold, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 821,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 989 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.