Woolworths Ltd. v. Crotty
Australia High Court
(1942) 66 CLR 603 (1942)
- Written by Sarah Hoffman, JD
Facts
Elizabeth Crotty’s (plaintiff) son was electrocuted and killed by an imperfectly constructed electric globe light sold by Woolsworths Ltd. (defendant). The jury found that the light was not fit for the purpose it was put to by the decedent, that Woolsworth had impliedly warranted that the light was fit for such a purpose, and that Woolsworth was, therefore, liable for breach of contract. There was no finding of negligence or any other tortious liability. The jury awarded damages to Crotty and her husband for their son’s wrongful death. Woolsworths appealed, and the intermediate court upheld the trial court’s judgment. Woolsworths appealed to the Australia High Court.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Latham, C.J.)
Concurrence (McTiernan, J.)
Concurrence (Rich, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 806,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.