World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. Woodson

585 P.2d 351 (1978)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. Woodson

Oklahoma Supreme Court
585 P.2d 351 (1978)

Play video

Facts

The Robinson family bought a new Audi in New York. They decided to move to Arizona, so they drove west. Along the way, they passed through Oklahoma, and a reckless driver rear-ended their Audi. The car caught fire, injuring Mrs. Robinson and both children. The Robinsons filed a lawsuit in Oklahoma state court, claiming that the car’s gas tank and fuel system had been designed improperly. They sued the car’s distributor and the dealer from which they’d bought their Audi. The dealer, Seaway (plaintiff), operated only in New York. The distributor—somewhat misleadingly called World-Wide Volkswagen (plaintiff)—operated only on the east coast. Both lacked any ties to Oklahoma and argued, in a special appearance, that the trial court lacked jurisdiction over them. The trial court disagreed and allowed the case to proceed against World-Wide and Seaway, both of which then challenged that decision at the Oklahoma Supreme Court. The legal dispute was technically between World-Wide and Seaway, on one side, and the judge, Woodson (defendant), on the other side because they challenged his exercise of jurisdiction over them.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Barnes, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 820,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 820,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 989 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 820,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 989 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership