Wornick Co. v. Casas

856 S.W.2d 732 (1993)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Wornick Co. v. Casas

Texas Supreme Court
856 S.W.2d 732 (1993)

  • Written by Robert Cane, JD
Play video

Facts

Diana Casas (plaintiff) worked as the human-resources director for Right Away Foods Corporation (Right Away) (defendant), which was owned by Wornick Company (defendant). Casas’s supervisor, Valerie Woerner (defendant) terminated Casas suddenly and unexpectedly one day. Woerner met with Casas and informed her that she was being terminated because she had been disloyal to the company and had a bad attitude. Woerner provided no additional information at Casas’s request and instructed her to leave the company premises immediately. Woerner displayed a normal demeanor and did not raise her voice to Casas during the four-minute meeting. Casas, who had received positive performance reviews, believed she was fired to prevent her from disclosing the unethical practices of Right Away employees to government auditors. Casas was escorted from Woerner’s office to her own office by a security guard. The security supervisor was present at Casas’s office to escort her off of the property. The security supervisor carried a box of Casas’s belongings to her car for her. The security supervisor and the security guard that escorted Casas to her office were not rude or offensive to Casas. Security guards generally did not escort salaried employees who were fired, like Casas, off the property though the company did have a practice of having security guards escort hourly employees off the property. Casas sued Right Away, Wornick, and Woerner for intentional infliction of emotional distress. The trial court granted summary judgment against Casas. The appellate court reversed the trial court judgment regarding the emotional-distress claim. Right Away, Wornick, and Woerner appealed to the Texas Supreme Court.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Phillips, C.J.)

Concurrence (Hecht, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership