Worthington v. Wilson

8 F.3d 1253 (1993)

From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Worthington v. Wilson

United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
8 F.3d 1253 (1993)

Facts

Richard Worthington (plaintiff) was arrested on February 25, 1989, by two officers of the Peoria Heights Police Department. The officers re-injured Worthington’s already injured hand, breaking several bones. On February 25, 1991, Worthington filed suit against the Village of Peoria Heights (the village) (defendant) and “unknown named police officers” under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging that the officers’ conduct violated Worthington’s constitutional rights. The suit was filed on the last day of Illinois’s two-year statute-of-limitations period for a § 1983 claim. Worthington voluntarily dismissed his claim against the village but pursued his claim against the officers. On June 17, 1991, Worthington amended his complaint, naming officers Dave Wilson and Jeff Wall (defendants) in place of the previous “unknown named police officers.” Wilson and Wall moved to dismiss the amended complaint because it was filed after the statute of limitations expired. They argued that the amended complaint did not relate back to the original complaint under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(c) and was therefore time-barred. The district court agreed and dismissed Worthington’s complaint. Worthington appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Manion, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,400 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership