Logourl black
From our private database of 14,000+ case briefs...

Woyma v. Ciolek

Ohio Court of Appeals
465 N.E.2d 486 (1983)


Facts

In 1977, Herman Shackleford (defendant) rear-ended a car Ann Woyma (plaintiff) was driving. Woyma was a teacher and had some students in the car when the accident occurred. During the collision, Woyma experienced whiplash. Woyma did not appear to have serious injuries at the time of the accident, but did have headaches and neck pain for a few days afterward. Woyma also had headaches a few weeks later but did not think they were related to the crash. Shackleford’s insurance company spoke with Woyma about the children, the damage to the car, and Woyma’s current injuries. The company then covered the costs of fixing Woyma’s car. The insurance company also paid Woyma $25 for the cost of the x-ray she got immediately after the accident and for the pain and suffering Woyma experienced in the couple of days following the accident. After paying these expenses, Shackleford’s insurance company mailed Woyma a release form stating that Woyma was releasing all claims based on the accident, including both known and unknown injuries. Woyma signed the release without talking with an attorney, believing that she did not have any continuing injuries. A year later, however, Woyma began to experience new symptoms as a result of the car crash. Woyma sued Ciolek (defendant), the administrator of Shackleford’s estate, to recover the new treatment costs for Woyma’s latent back injury. Woyma asked the trial court to set aside the release, and the court agreed. The jury ultimately awarded Woyma $22,500. Ciolek appealed.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Pryatel, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 174,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.