Wright v. Brooke Group Ltd.

652 N.W.2d 159 (2002)

From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Wright v. Brooke Group Ltd.

Iowa Supreme Court
652 N.W.2d 159 (2002)

EL
Play video

Facts

Robert and DeAnn Wright (defendants) filed a suit against cigarette manufacturers (the manufacturers) (defendants) in federal district court for damages resulting from Robert’s smoking. The Wrights alleged negligence, strict liability, breach of implied and express warranty, breach of special assumed duty, fraudulent misrepresentation, fraudulent nondisclosure, and civil conspiracy. The Wrights claimed that the consumer-contemplation and risk-utility tests applied to determine whether a product was unreasonably dangerous in a design-defect case. The manufacturers contended that only the consumer-contemplation test must apply to design-defect cases, so that a common knowledge of the risks of smoking would preclude a finding that cigarettes are dangerous to an extent beyond that contemplated by an ordinary consumer. The manufacturers filed a motion to dismiss the Wrights’ claims. After the court failed to grant the bulk of the manufacturer’s motion to dismiss, the manufacturers asked the federal court to certify novel and unsettled questions of products-liability law to the Iowa Supreme Court. The district court certified the question of which test applies under Iowa law to determine whether cigarettes are unreasonably dangerous.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Ternus, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,400 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership