Logourl black
From our private database of 14,200+ case briefs...

Wright v. Brown

Supreme Court of Connecticut
356 A.2d 176 (1975)

Facts

Mary Wright (plaintiff) was attacked and injured by a dog owned by William Brown (defendant). The dog had attacked another person less than two weeks earlier and had been placed into a quarantine pursuant to Connecticut General Statutes § 22-358, which requires a dog that attacks or bites a person to be placed into quarantine for a minimum of 14 days. However, Wright claimed that the dog had been released prior to the end of the required 14-day period and that Wright had been attacked and injured as a result. Wright brought a complaint against Brown, the dog warden (defendant), and the Town of Plainville (town) (defendant), seeking damages. In her complaint, Wright claimed that the dog warden and the town had violated § 22-358 and thus acted negligently. The dog warden and the town demurred, arguing that Wright was not within the class of people that § 22-358 was intended to protect. The trial court determined that § 22-358 was intended to protect only persons alleged to have been bitten by diseased dogs, and that Wright was not within this class of persons because she had not claimed she was bitten by a diseased dog. Wright appealed the decision.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Bogdanski, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 252,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,200 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Here's why 252,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners not other law students.
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet.
  • 14,200 briefs - keyed to 189 casebooks.
  • Uniform format for every case brief.
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language.
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions.
  • Ability to tag case briefs in an outlining tool.
  • Top-notch customer support.