Wright v. Maersk Line, Ltd.
United States District Court for the Southern District of New York
2003 WL 470335 (2003)
- Written by Salina Kennedy, JD
Facts
William Wright (plaintiff) was injured at work and sued his employer, Maersk Line, Ltd. (Maersk) (defendant). The jury found Wright and Maersk each 50 percent at fault for Wright’s injury and determined that the total value of Wright’s future lost earnings was $235,000 before discount to present value. Maersk’s expert recommended a net discount rate of 3 percent. The expert reached this figure by subtracting an inflation rate of 3 percent from an interest rate, based on long-term Treasury securities, of 6 percent. Wright’s expert recommended a net discount rate of 2 percent, basing his opinion on a more conservative interest rate. The court considered which net discount rate to apply.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (McKenna, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.