Wright v. Roanoke Redevelopment and Housing Authority

479 U.S. 418 (1987)

From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Wright v. Roanoke Redevelopment and Housing Authority

United States Supreme Court
479 U.S. 418 (1987)

Facts

The Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) established housing authorities across the country. The housing authorities owned housing projects that were rented to low-income people. Moreover, the Brooke Amendment to the Housing Act of 1937 imposed a ceiling for rents charged to people living in housing projects. The Brooke Amendment’s rent ceiling included a reasonable amount for the use of utilities. A group of tenants (the tenants) (plaintiffs) who lived in housing projects owned by the Roanoke Redevelopment and Housing Authority (the housing authority) (defendant) brought suit against the housing authority, contending that the housing authority overcharged them for utilities in violation of the rent ceiling imposed by the Brooke Amendment. HUD regulations indicated that tenants were permitted to bring suit under the Brooke Amendment to challenge the reasonableness of housing authorities’ utilities charges. Nonetheless, the district court held that the tenants were precluded from bringing suit. The court of appeals affirmed. The tenants appealed to the United States Supreme Court.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (White, J.)

Dissent (O’Connor, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 830,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 830,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 830,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,400 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership