Quimbee logo
DMCA.com Protection Status

Wrobel v. Trapani

264 N.E.2d 240 (1970)

Case BriefRelatedOptions
From our private database of 33,600+ case briefs...

Wrobel v. Trapani

Illinois Appellate Court

264 N.E.2d 240 (1970)


Edward Wrobel worked for John Hillesheim, a subcontractor of Bennett Trapani (defendant), a general-contractor home builder. Wrobel was standing on a ladder he placed outside to work on a second-floor window while a Trapani employee, Leo Townsend (defendant), worked on the inside of the window. Wrobel did not know what rung he was standing on, but his knees were lower than the top rung. Townsend lowered the upper sash of the window, causing Wrobel to fall. Townsend believed he lowered the sash half an inch, but Wrobel testified Townsend lowered the sash four inches. Townsend testified that Wrobel aligned the ladder’s right rail with the left side of the window, and that the ladder only reached the window’s bottom edge. Townsend also testified that normally the top of a ladder is placed near the top of the window, on the side where the work was to be done. Trapani and Donald Stewart, a safety engineer, testified that the highest rung a person should stand on was the fifth from the top and that the worker’s body should be between the rails. Trapani testified that the ladder’s position did not meet safety standards. Wrobel sued Trapani for negligence and Townsend for willfully violating the Structural Work Act (the Act). Trapani filed a third-party suit for indemnification against Hillesheim (defendant). The trial court entered a directed verdict in favor of Hillesheim. Trapani appealed. Wrobel was not part of the appeal. Trapani argued he was entitled to indemnification from Hillesheim on the theory of active-passive indemnity. Trapani also argued for a new trial because there were questions of fact for the jury. Trapani argued that his violation of the Act was passive in nature and Hillesheim’s conduct was active. Trapani argued that his responsibility was merely general supervision and coordination of the project, meaning he was the lesser delinquent and Hillesheim was the active delinquent. Hillesheim argued that the active-passive theory did not apply because the act of Townsend, Trapani’s employee, was shown to be a proximate cause of Wrobel’s injury.

Rule of Law


Holding and Reasoning (English, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 603,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 603,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 33,600 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 603,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 33,600 briefs - keyed to 984 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership